I have noticed that many studios list ALL of their models as being bi. I can see why a straight male might want to be listed as bi to appeal to gay viewers.. but even then, there is a huge market for straight men getting naked and jacking off for gay guys.

It makes no sense to me for a GAY male to be listed as bi. Some models are obviously gay, and they tell chatters they are gay, yet their profiles say they are bi! Unlike having straight men appealing to gays by saying they are bi.. does someone really think that women prefer to chat with bi guys more than gay ones? First, if anything, women LOVE gay guys. Second, women do not go private. I am sure it has happened a few times.. but the odds are probably greater of being struck by lightning. There are very few women chatters too.

My point is, why force an obviously gay model to say they are bi? It is illogical.

It reminds me of my former roommate. His first sexual experiences were with one female which lasted about 6 months. Since then, he has had NO interest in females, yet still calls himself bi!

I don't think it really matters because people learn not to pay attention to labels. Quote

There are a lot of models who don't know what's in their bio/profile.

They are often filled out by the studio or manager.

I have found this out by asking questions about things that are written in their bio's/proflies, and they have told me they didn't kno what was in there. Quote

It's a fantasy site. Models don't use their real names, why should they reveal their true sexual orientation?

As you say, labels are irrelevant Quote

It's a fantasy site. Models don't use their real names, why should they reveal their true sexual orientation?

As you say, labels are irrelevant


It is not that they don't reveal their true sexual orientation. There are a lot of models on this site who are gay, they tell you that they are gay, they tell you that they are 100% gay... and they tell you that their local studio told them that they have to list themselves as bi. That doesn't make sense to me.
There is logic to list a straight model as being bi, but I can't see any benefit to list a gay model as being bi.
Quote